Align traceability placement assertions with captured-view reveal
This commit is contained in:
@@ -64,8 +64,9 @@ ordinary OA/SA edges, multiple traces, explicit hides plus disabled Trace kind,
|
||||
port owners and relation correspondence. Do not infer visible lines from
|
||||
unfiltered edge_availability or confuse unrelated model traces with counterparts.
|
||||
|
||||
Native acceptance must start with an OA-only view and existing named SA
|
||||
counterpart, find/place it through the visible controls, see/select the trace,
|
||||
Native acceptance starts with an OA-owned mixed view, one already visible
|
||||
correspondence pair and another existing named SA counterpart not yet placed.
|
||||
Find/place it through the visible controls, see/select the additional trace,
|
||||
inspect an absent-line visibility reason, Undo/Redo and Save/reopen. Inspect
|
||||
toolbar/canvas space and chooser clarity at a realistic window size. Different
|
||||
help text or count tests alone do not resolve the user's comprehension complaint.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user