Prepare Linux delivery and correct lifecycle rendering build types

2026-09-11 07:53:42 -07:00
parent cb611a71df
commit 29084050a7
41 changed files with 1120 additions and 25 deletions
@@ -50,6 +50,11 @@ the owner's clarification allows domain constraints rather than arbitrary moveme
 - The separate baseline-context experiment passed218 assertions; explicit
  one-level overrides reduce repeated stable assumptions while complete frozen
  definition environments remain necessary. Proposed syntax is not source7.
+- After the user's virtualization/reboot change, supported Ubuntu26.04 install
+  completed exit0 and a real x86_64 WSL2 kernel shell completed. Later VM startups
+  timed out before apt. This establishes initial guest execution, not reliable
+  Linux builds or GUI acceptance; exact outcomes and next controlled trial are
+  in the [WSL record](release-wsl-postboot-ytr83r-20260911.md).

 ## Assumptions and unresolved questions

@@ -61,9 +66,10 @@ the owner's clarification allows domain constraints rather than arbitrary moveme
 - Pinned package provenance must be distinguished from checked type compatibility;
  unchanged quantity kinds cannot become incompatible merely through cosmetic
  repackaging without a deliberate policy. Energy and Torque remain distinct.
- Which supported environment will complete current Linux GUI/service/package
-  execution remains a release question. Old failed or denied experiments do not
-  establish a current successful environment.
+- Ubuntu26.04/WSL2 is the current supported Linux route; reliable repeat startup,
+  guest toolchain/dependencies and GUI/service/package execution remain open.
+  Initial shell success does not erase later startup timeouts. Old QEMU work is
+  retained as history, not the next route to repeat.
 - Large-model human/AI task usability, cross-file refactoring, actual chooser
  latency/keyboard/minimum geometry and complete native lifecycle behavior remain
  to be measured. Parser admission or a widget experiment is insufficient.