Verify compact source editing in the native application
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# Ordinary default omission: public consumer verification
|
||||
|
||||
Follow-up: the [completed native workflow evidence](text-default-omission-native-20260913.md)
|
||||
supersedes the native-workflow gap recorded at this earlier checkpoint.
|
||||
|
||||
The ordinary source changes at `7bb366f66a8c6f8b6f66fc9b04c9e3b39f84b78e` now pass the CLI, HTTP and desktop automated consumer gates, strict workspace Clippy, and a matching Windows build. A new HTTP regression test verifies the distinction between preserving authored source and producing compact canonical export. Native workflow acceptance and integration remain incomplete.
|
||||
|
||||
## Executed candidate and results
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user