Record bounded wrapped-label trials and independent conservation review
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,28 @@
|
||||
# Architectural and product decisions
|
||||
|
||||
## Measured label wrapping remains experimental — 2026-10-01
|
||||
|
||||
Preserve the isolated E/F prototypes and their
|
||||
[validation, locked readings and conservation oracles](experiments/wrapped-label-20261001/validation.md)
|
||||
without promoting either placement rule. E centers two measured lines on the
|
||||
own stroke; F offsets three lines beside it. Both reduce backing width using
|
||||
actual Iced shaping and conserve canonical model data and route geometry. F's
|
||||
first reader still misidentified two exchanges; both readers retained a plausible
|
||||
wrong conversation ownership. The experiments therefore do not meet dependable
|
||||
association at Fit, despite correct E endpoint guesses. Separate readers and a
|
||||
single fixture do not establish causal superiority or general usability.
|
||||
|
||||
Keep raw routing distinct from derived presentation during gesture previews:
|
||||
the adversarial different-edge test exposed stale wrapped bounds after guard
|
||||
refusal, fixed by retaining the original core RoutedView. This is reusable
|
||||
architecture evidence, not acceptance of private fixture-specific layout code.
|
||||
Saved fraction/offset survive under F, but ordinary reopening derives one line;
|
||||
external profiles cannot provide a production formatting contract. A general
|
||||
format/layout proposal requires explicit persistence semantics, shared consumer
|
||||
bounds, native representative workflows and glyph/performance evidence. Further
|
||||
work should address view scale and ambiguous stroke ownership rather than tune
|
||||
this same label scene until it looks successful.
|
||||
|
||||
## Private source composition decision — 2026-09-23
|
||||
|
||||
Adopt the opaque validated original-span rename batch as the next private
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user