3.1 KiB
Final packaging and claim review
Reviewed the final results and copied source/result/conservation/native reviews, plus the completed evidence archive. This is a bounded publication gate for the existing experiment; no compiler, application, new candidate or native investigation was executed.
No material packaging or claim error found. The package is ready for the parent's publication/checkpoint step. This review does not assert that publication has already succeeded, that the candidate is adopted, or that issue32 is complete.
Archive verification
evidence/boundary-order-3e21c1bc.zip: exactly4,310,136bytes; SHA256bb6b896ff2401290869a904f7768ebb52b6f0ab36fada06badbe9abb301c37b8.- Exactly156 unique ZIP members; member-name set exactly equals
evidence/manifest.json, with no duplicate or unexpected member. - ZIP CRC readback passes for all members. Every uncompressed member's byte size and SHA256 equals its manifest entry.
- Five named native PNG captures are present. The independent result audit script and its explicit SCC helper are both included; the helper dependency is not omitted.
- All relative Markdown links in the topic documents resolve at this checkpoint. The new final review is outside the frozen archive and does not imply a replacement archive hash.
Claim and attribution checks
Results identify generator/test source 3e21c1bca245944ae0ec7bb02aaa920f45f2cc30, distinguish final15 focused tests/strict Clippy/release gates from earlier14-test evidence at42f595a5, and retain20 candidate outcomes,15 child processes and eight unchanged control streams as distinct inventories. No full-suite, controlled-performance or production acceptance claim is substituted for these scoped checks.
The comparison retains simple-case and chained-parent improvements alongside expanded-workshop crossing/sharing regressions, folded sharing growth, and anchored/local-SCC label problems. Flat full-Project/metric equality and model conservation are attributed to the relevant mechanical audits. Conservation coverage limits are explicit: dormant attachment/translation behavior is not claimed exercised merely because the checker supports it.
Native attribution correctly separates the3e21 candidate Project generator from the reused d6f45a13a7b8ab8dc9b84ee432a832609f5af6ed GUI renderer, executable SHA256 133375d57bdecf3f3effe5ecc13ec121e1257b90838f2cdb64fb91aa9a530d1b. The planner was not invoked through native Arrange. Four imported Projects and five captures are the observed scope; two other staged controls are not represented as viewed. The independent native review explicitly handles stale window-title metadata, distinguishes readable text from label-background interruption of the parent outline, and limits the local-SCC finding to overview/selection-assisted tracing. No Undo/Redo or production command-integration claim is inferred from these captures.
The final results link the real archive/manifest and bounded reviews, rather than retaining the earlier forthcoming-evidence placeholder. Publication remains the parent's final step. Stop after that requested publication/checkpoint; this review authorizes no further implementation or experiment.