4.7 KiB
Locked first exposure: static screenshot reading
Source: captures/00-fit-pristine.jpg, viewed once at original detail as a complete screenshot. No crop, other image, model, repository, code, answer key, or agent interpretation was consulted before these answers. These are first impressions from visible strokes and ports, not verified model facts. Confidence values are qualitative estimates.
First answers
| Label | First endpoint/direction interpretation | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Request field repair | Assess pressure alarm → Repair valve in the field | Moderate (about 65%) |
| Report repair result | Repair valve in the field → Confirm safe pressure | Moderate (about 60%) |
| Technician service conversation | Pressure coordination service — Field technician, with no clearly visible arrow direction | Moderate for endpoints (about 65%); moderately high that direction is not visually established (about 80%) |
Request field repair
I associate this text, just below the Pressure coordination service card, with the horizontal stroke around screenshot y=611, running from about x=430 to x=807. My reading traces its left end upward to the Assess pressure alarm card's right port (roughly 422,568), and its right end upward to the upper left port of Repair valve in the field (roughly 815,591). The upper repair port appears to point toward the repair card, giving the direction above.
The alternatives I cannot confidently exclude are that one of the vertical overlaps belongs to a different relationship, or that the nearby Pressure coordination service is the source. The latter is spatially plausible from the label position but is less consistent with my first attempt to follow the stroke. The outline-like long rectangular routes complicate distinguishing crossings from route turns.
Report repair result
I associate this label with the horizontal stroke around y=646, extending left from the lower left port of Repair valve in the field (roughly 815,646) to a vertical route near x=521. My first reading follows that route downward toward Confirm safe pressure, whose right port (roughly 511,797) appears to have a leftward arrow. The repair card's lower port also appears oriented leftward, supporting travel away from repair toward confirmation.
I am less confident about the long vertical continuation than the label's association with the y=646 stroke. Reset valve remotely is a plausible mistaken destination because its connection is immediately beside the same vertical corridor; another alternative is that a shared-looking stroke routes back toward the alarm function. The screenshot does not make the separation of coincident or closely spaced vertical lines easy to establish.
Technician service conversation
My first reading assigns the two-line label to the horizontal connector emerging from the Pressure coordination service card's right square port at roughly (773,568), passing beneath the label toward x=855, and then routing toward the Field technician card's left square port at roughly (865,451). I see square endpoint marks rather than a definite arrowhead at those two cards, so I read a connection with unspecified direction rather than confidently calling it one-way or two-way.
The label appears to own the short horizontal segment immediately below it, near y=568, and its associated orthogonal route toward the technician. It does not initially read as the label of the technician-to-repair stroke farther right, which drops from the technician card near x=934 and turns left into the top of the repair card. Nevertheless, the label sits close to multiple vertical strokes and that technician-to-repair relationship is a plausible alternate ownership reading. I cannot confidently distinguish every bend near the shared upper horizontal corridor.
Legibility and scope
The main application controls are readable. At the displayed 52% diagram zoom, card names require concentrated reading and relationship labels are substantially smaller and faint. “Technician service conversation” is readable as two lines, but its wrapping and position do not by themselves establish stroke ownership. “Request field repair” and “Report repair result” are just legible in the full image, with close scrutiny. Small port shapes and overlapping vertical routes are a greater obstacle to dependable endpoint/direction reading than the large card arrangement.
These answers are deliberately retained as an unverified first exposure. This is evidence from one agent reading one static image; it does not establish human usability, generalized UX performance, a causal comparison, or model correctness. No native GUI interaction or answer-key verification was performed.