two questions per teaching unit: predict → teach → check (owner 2026-10-03)

The teaching cycle gains its motivation question. The teach quiz schema
now carries a REQUIRED type field — predict (posed before the teaching,
arrives open, the learner predicts the next step) or check (posed after,
arrives collapsed behind the reveal). The prober's quiz stays role-less.

- core: quizInputObject.type union + normalizeQuizType + the reveal law
  as pure quizNeedsReveal; QuestionData.questionType; note → thinking
  rename (legacy reads fold back); readingThinking channel on answers;
  compactAnswerForModel emits thinking / thinkingWhileReading
- tools: descriptions stripped to mechanics — QUIZ_OPTION_CRAFT and
  EXPLAIN_DOCTRINE deleted, doctrine moved to the prompt layer
  (reverses the 2026-09-27 placement, owner 2026-10-03); shared
  quizDescription/explainDescription builders differ only in deltas
- prompts: shared/20-question-tools.md rewritten (option craft,
  transcribed-speech leniency, the two thinking channels); new
  teacher/28-predictions.md (cycle, roles, skip rule, resolution law);
  20-teaching + 30-question-principles scoped to the new taxonomy
- UI: predictions render open with a Prediction eyebrow, verdict shows
  but the explanation tucks behind a toggle; the reading-thinking field
  mounts while a check waits (dictation claims it until reveal);
  answered card separates thinking vs thinking-while-reading blocks
This commit is contained in:
amosblomqvist
2026-10-04 00:53:29 +03:00
parent 571cc94053
commit 360d564a6c
19 changed files with 664 additions and 106 deletions
+21
View File
@@ -1280,6 +1280,27 @@ describe("prompt composition", () => {
assert.ok(!prober.includes("Question principles"), "the teach-phase fragment never composes into the prober");
});
it("the predict-check cycle composes into the teacher; the craft chunk reaches BOTH agents (owner 2026-10-03)", () => {
const teacher = composeInstructions("teacher");
// the cycle doctrine (28-predictions.md) — teacher-only
assert.ok(teacher.includes("predict → teach → check"), "the cycle line is in");
assert.ok(teacher.includes('The prediction (`type: "predict"`)'), "the prediction role section is in");
assert.ok(teacher.includes("Skip the prediction"), "the skip rule is in");
assert.ok(teacher.includes('The check (`type: "check"`)'), "the check role section is in");
// the craft + thinking channels (shared/20-question-tools.md) — BOTH agents
const prober = composeInstructions("prober");
for (const [name, prompt] of [
["teacher", teacher],
["prober", prober],
] as const) {
assert.ok(prompt.includes("asymmetry"), `${name} carries the option craft (moved out of tool descriptions)`);
assert.ok(prompt.includes("TRANSCRIBED SPEECH"), `${name} reads dictated thinking leniently`);
assert.ok(prompt.includes("thinkingWhileReading"), `${name} knows the reading channel`);
}
// the cycle is teach-phase doctrine — it never composes into the prober
assert.ok(!prober.includes("predict → teach → check"), "the teaching cycle stays out of the prober");
});
it("the sources-v0 prompt lines compose: read/pdf doctrine in the teacher, the read line in the prober", () => {
const teacher = composeInstructions("teacher");
assert.ok(teacher.includes("Learner source files"), "the teacher carries the source-files section");