Split contracts.ts by domain: plan / graph / chat / jobs

Purely mechanical: src/core/contracts/{plan,graph,chat,jobs}.ts carry the
sections verbatim (graph = nodes + ledgers + extraction findings; jobs =
the async ack-and-steer protocol + tool results + demo bridge), and
contracts.ts becomes a re-exporting barrel so every existing import path
(@/src/core and ./contracts.ts) is unchanged.

Wave-2 lane ownership follows the split: the graph stream owns
contracts/graph.ts, the teacher stream owns contracts/jobs.ts — same-file
contract collisions between streams are structurally impossible now;
cross-domain schema changes go through master.
This commit is contained in:
amosblomqvist
2026-09-05 21:20:38 +03:00
parent d8324ca9bb
commit 8a9497bf59
5 changed files with 550 additions and 524 deletions
+190
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
/**
* Knowledge-graph contracts — nodes, ledgers, extraction findings
*
* Part of the domain-split contracts (src/core/contracts/): each domain file
* is owned outright by its stream — cross-domain schema changes go through
* master. Pure types + protocol docs + tiny pure helpers; type-only imports
* of "ai" (safe everywhere: server, client, tests). See docs/vision.md.
*/
// ─── Knowledge graph (vision §1 — global, cross-session) ────────────────────
export type EdgeType = "requires" | "supports";
export interface GraphNode {
/** Opaque stable id, store-assigned: "n_" + nanoid-like. */
id: string;
/** Short name / header for the fact (2-6 words) — the rendering handle.
* NODE THEORY: a node is an OBJECTIVE fact, never learner- or
* session-relative. No "the learner understands…", no "this session
* covered…" — just the fact, world-facing. The learner's relationship
* to the fact lives ENTIRELY in the event ledger: state labels are
* derived from quiz outcomes, never written into the node. */
name: string;
/** Canonical proposition statement — the full fact, one reasoning step,
* also objective (no learner / teacher / session references). */
statement: string;
/** Verbatim alternate statements from sessions (merge target audit trail). */
aliases: string[];
kind: "truth" | "misconception";
createdAt: string;
}
export interface GraphEdge {
/** Prerequisite GraphNode id. */
from: string;
to: string;
type: EdgeType;
/** Chat ids that asserted this edge (teacher may simplify — auditable). */
provenance: string[];
}
/** mappings.jsonl line — the session→graph identity map: the extraction
* pipeline's proposition (identified by its source id) → the graph node it
* merged into. The merge audit trail: one line per (chat, graph node). */
export interface NodeMapping {
chatId: string;
/** The writer's local id for the proposition — a plan-tree node id when
* tree-derived, else the extractor's proposition id ("p1", …). */
sourceId: string;
graphNodeId: string;
}
/** sessions.jsonl line — the emission checkpoint for one chat (which chats
* have been folded, and through which updatedAt — never fold twice). */
export interface SessionCheckpoint {
chatId: string;
/** The chat record's `updatedAt` at the time of the fold. */
foldedAt: string;
}
export type LedgerEventKind =
| "probe-correct"
| "probe-miss"
| "dont-know"
| "misconception-signaled"
| "taught"
| "check-correct"
| "check-incorrect";
export interface LedgerEvent {
/** null = not yet attributed (untagged probe events; consolidation assigns). */
nodeId: string | null;
kind: LedgerEventKind;
chatId: string;
at: string;
/** Idempotency key: the quiz part's toolCallId or `taught:<treeNodeId>` —
* re-emission of the same chat must never double-record an event. */
ref?: string;
/** The learner's quiz note — diagnostic gold (vision §1 calibration). */
note?: string;
/** The quiz question text, when nodeId is null (later attribution input). */
question?: string;
}
/**
* Store format (src/store/graph.ts): JSONL ledgers at config.LEDGER_FILES
* (nodes/edges/events/mappings/sessions). The derived graph is rebuilt by
* reading the ledgers — store events, derive state. sessions.jsonl is the
* extraction checkpoint: which chats the extraction pipeline has processed,
* and through which updatedAt (never extract the same turns twice).
*
* The EXTRACTION PIPELINE is the sole graph writer (extractor → auditor →
* merger): the extractor proposes propositions/edges/attribution with
* verbatim evidence, the auditor drops anything unbacked, and the merger
* (core/graph.ts, deterministic) resolves identity against the existing
* ledgers and appends. See SessionFindings below.
*/
// ─── Extraction findings (extractor output → audit → merger input) ───────────
/** One proposed proposition — a node candidate. */
export interface ExtractedProposition {
/** Extractor-local id ("p1", …) referenced by edges + attribution. */
id: string;
/** Short name / header for the fact (2-6 words) — the rendering handle. */
name: string;
/** Canonical one-reasoning-step statement — an objective, world-facing
* fact (no learner / teacher / session references; the learner's
* relationship to it is carried only by the event attribution). */
statement: string;
/** Verbatim alternate phrasings from the session (merge aliases). */
aliases: string[];
kind: "truth" | "misconception";
/** The plan-tree node this came from, when it did (mapping provenance). */
treeNodeId?: string;
/** Verbatim transcript quotes backing the proposition. */
evidence: string[];
}
/** One proposed relation between two propositions. */
export interface ExtractedEdge {
/** Proposition id that is the prerequisite / support. */
from: string;
/** Proposition id that depends on / is supported by `from`. */
to: string;
type: EdgeType;
/** Verbatim transcript quotes backing the relation. */
evidence: string[];
}
/** The extractor's event attribution — its ONLY say about events. The kinds,
* timestamps, idempotency refs, notes and question texts are all rebuilt
* deterministically by the merger from the transcript's quiz / mark_done
* tool parts; the LLM supplies exactly the judgment call: WHICH proposition
* each one is about (vision open question: probes attribute retroactively,
* against the whole transcript — a pre-tree probe can map to a proposition
* the tree only articulates later). */
/** The extractor's event attribution — its ONLY say about events. Event
* kinds, timestamps, idempotency refs, notes and question texts are all
* rebuilt deterministically by the merger from the transcript's tool
* parts, and TAGGED events (quiz nodeId, mark_done tree node) resolve
* deterministically through the proposition mapping. The LLM supplies
* exactly the one judgment call that needs it — the vision's open
* probe-attribution question: WHICH proposition did an UNTAGGED probe
* test? Answered retroactively against the whole transcript — a pre-tree
* probe can map to a proposition the tree only articulates later. */
export interface ExtractionAttribution {
/** UNTAGGED quiz toolCallId → proposition id; missing / null =
* unattributed (the event lands with nodeId null + the question text,
* exactly like unattributable probes always did). */
quiz: Record<string, string | null>;
}
/** The extractor's — and, filtered, the auditor's — output shape. */
export interface SessionFindings {
propositions: ExtractedProposition[];
edges: ExtractedEdge[];
attribution: ExtractionAttribution;
}
/** The auditor's verdict: the verified subset, plus the drops (for the log —
* the audit trail of what was rejected and why). */
export interface AuditResult extends SessionFindings {
/** Dropped candidates: proposition id, edge "from→to", or attribution
* toolCallId — with the reason. */
dropped: { ref: string; reason: string }[];
}
/** Per-node state class for the home view (vision §1 "Home page") — derived,
* never stored: taught if ANY taught event; else the LATEST quiz event decides
* (known / missed / dont-know); a node with no events is a candidate. */
export type NodeStateClass = "taught" | "known" | "missed" | "dont-know" | "candidate";
/** The GET /api/graph payload — everything the home view's PURE renderer needs. */
export interface GraphSnapshot {
nodes: GraphNode[];
edges: GraphEdge[];
nodeStates: Record<string, NodeStateClass>;
/** chatId → title, for every chat that touched the graph. */
sessions: Record<string, string>;
/** nodeId → chatIds that touched the node (click-through provenance). */
nodeSessions: Record<string, string[]>;
}
/** Derive a short chat title from the learner's first message (pure).
* Used on chat creation; deterministic so tests can pin it. */
export function titleFromPrompt(prompt: string): string {
const oneLine = prompt.replace(/\s+/g, " ").trim();
return oneLine.length > 72 ? `${oneLine.slice(0, 72)}…` : oneLine;
}