ui: round four — thinner rail, tighter band, the accent step, early wrap

Owner round four on the user rows: (1) the rail thins - the gap inside
the 3ch inset grows 5px -> 8px, so the rail is calc(3ch-8px); total
inset still 3ch, chevron law intact. (2) The band padding drops again,
5px -> 4px (py-1). (3) The in-card thinking band steps to bg-accent -
the same ONE-STEP lift the chat band gets (background->card on the page,
card->accent on the card); card-color on card-color was invisible, the
accent gives the card rows a visible band with identical heights. (4)
pr-4 on the band rows - the expanded text wraps EARLY instead of hugging
the band's clear right edge.
This commit is contained in:
amosblomqvist
2026-10-08 18:38:07 +03:00
parent 497b29804c
commit d30ad42d9c
6 changed files with 47 additions and 29 deletions
+10 -5
View File
@@ -143,11 +143,16 @@ export function AnsweredCard({ answer }: { answer: QuestionAnswerData }) {
{(answer.thinking ?? answer.note) && (
/* The SAME unified row (owner round, 2026-10-05): the quiz answer's
thinking is the identical collapsible ThinkingBlock — and since
owner round three (2026-10-07) IDENTICALLY styled, band and all:
collapsed thinking matches in height everywhere, card or chat
(card-on-card is quiet by design; too light → revert). */
<ThinkingBlock testId="your-thinking" label="YOUR THINKING" text={answer.thinking ?? answer.note ?? ""} />
thinking is the identical collapsible ThinkingBlock — one
geometry, and since owner round four (2026-10-07) the band steps
to accent on the card's surface (the same one-step lift the chat
band gets). Collapsed thinking matches in height everywhere. */
<ThinkingBlock
testId="your-thinking"
label="YOUR THINKING"
text={answer.thinking ?? answer.note ?? ""}
inCard
/>
)}
{/* px-3→removed: card p-4 + box px-3 double-inset sat the "Why" label deeper