Owner round (2026-10-05): the problem pose only really needs statement,
mode, target, modelSolution; conclude needs no reveal field.
- problemInputObject drops decisionPoints, expectedWrongMoves, strategy,
rationale. Halves the pose payload (the GLM incident's failing args
were 3.3KB — a direct weak-model hardening).
- concludeInputObject drops solutionReveal: the reveal is the
modelSolution committed at pose time, shown verbatim at conclude.
- Doctrine pass (00-base mechanics, 10-doctrine V.4/V.5): the commitment
is the solution alone; the reveal instruction points at it.
Fixtures slimmed to the new shapes (flow, agents, heal). ConcludeCard's
render of legacy solutionReveal input stays until the card redesign
lands (Slice C).
Drives handleChatRequest with the real practice agent + faux engine:
pose persists its ack and owes no continuation; a commit arrives as the
'Committed answer:' user message and the conclude turn continues to the
reveal; a nudge carries the 'Thinking trace' label and never concludes;
Esc's silent marker deactivates at once and the next input rides the
synthesized dismissed-conclude pair (shared CONCLUDE_ACK_TEXT).
amosblomqvist