- Every session starts with the learner's knowledge graph as base
context (precision probing); selection problem noted: pedagogical
relevance != semantic closeness (structural neighborhood, diagnostic
hotspots, frontier strip); strategies to tune on data.
- Sub-agent architecture: async background workers with live activity
indicators; demo-builder TESTS code headlessly; visual-maker verifies
by looking (port of vault svg-maker); mermaid needs no sub-agent;
researcher tool for fact verification (port of pi web-search/web-fetch
+ interactive-subagents researcher prompt).
- Not-a-chat presentation principle marked LOW PRIORITY per user.
Margin model flaws (user feedback): fragment placement needs unreliable
routing; scattering kills the receipt moment and chronology; session
value is in the moment, revision is rare, HTML export deprioritized.
Evolved model: one chronological spine; learner blocks are intact typed
'interjection' cards; teacher replies as woven Q&A interludes
(quote-then-answer); anchoring is a link overlay (backlinks), margins
demoted to a computed view. Chat-ness dies by type asymmetry, not
relocation.
Asymmetry of artifact: the teacher writes the document (whiteboard), the
learner writes in the margins (voice/floor). Bubbles die; the unit is the
block; chronology yields to tree structure; Q&A becomes document
furniture; the composer becomes a response field. Presentation-layer
change only — the interaction model stays conversational.
Captures 2026-08-22 decisions: hybrid live-emission + consolidation graph
construction (reversing the vault doc's teacher-untouched rule), one
substrate merged across sessions, structured plan-tree tools (mermaid
demoted to ad-hoc), probe/teach phase separation with collapsed teach
checks, right-panel tree view, LaTeX delimiter switch plan, and a
dependency-ordered roadmap.
Amos