14 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
amosblomqvist 0f2519a349 ui: round five — no band in cards, the rail narrows again
Owner verdict on the accent step: way too light - in-card thinking
drops the band entirely (rail only, identical heights). The rail
narrows again: 14px gap inside the 3ch inset (rail calc(3ch-14px),
about 8px) - the wide rail was distracting. Total inset still 3ch,
chevron law intact.
2026-10-08 18:45:49 +03:00
amosblomqvist d30ad42d9c ui: round four — thinner rail, tighter band, the accent step, early wrap
Owner round four on the user rows: (1) the rail thins - the gap inside
the 3ch inset grows 5px -> 8px, so the rail is calc(3ch-8px); total
inset still 3ch, chevron law intact. (2) The band padding drops again,
5px -> 4px (py-1). (3) The in-card thinking band steps to bg-accent -
the same ONE-STEP lift the chat band gets (background->card on the page,
card->accent on the card); card-color on card-color was invisible, the
accent gives the card rows a visible band with identical heights. (4)
pr-4 on the band rows - the expanded text wraps EARLY instead of hugging
the band's clear right edge.
2026-10-08 18:38:07 +03:00
amosblomqvist 497b29804c ui: round three — the tight band, one geometry everywhere
Owner round three on the user rows: (1) the band padding halves,
py-2.5 -> py-[5px] — subtle, not tall; same for the messages. (2) The
in-card thinking joins the band: identical styling and heights for
collapsed thinking in the chat and inside question cards (card-on-card
is quiet by design; revert if it reads too light). (3) The left gap
MATCHES the new 5px padding, so the rail fills the rest of the 3ch
inset - border-l-[calc(3ch-5px)] pl-[5px]: a thick muted rail, total
inset still 3ch (the chevron-alignment law survives). The banded prop
dies - one geometry, cards included.
2026-10-08 18:32:21 +03:00
amosblomqvist 3691e07118 ui: the document, all-in — card-color bands and the 6px rail
Owner round two on user-vs-agent clarity (the chat-comeback was tried
and set aside): we go all in on documents. No chat sides. User messages
and every transcript user-thinking row are full-width CARD-COLOR BANDS
- the band is the authorship mark against the agent's transparent
prose. No rounded corners, no borders besides the rail.

The rail keeps its muted color but is now 6px wide (was 2px): the
artificially wide 3ch inset (the chevron-alignment law with the agent's
flush rows) is re-split - rail eats the air, the rail-to-text gap drops
from 3ch-2px to a natural 3ch-6px, and the total inset stays 3ch so the
chevrons still align. The 'You' label stays on messages - one register
with the thinking labels.

In-card thinking (inside answered cards) takes the rail but NO band:
card-color on card-color would be invisible; geometry alone carries it.
Transcript rows arrive expanded (clearly sent) - the reading lift now
opens on arrival too; the in-card row stays collapsed. Cmd+T still
rules all rows.

Also this round: the answered-card last-child rhythm law
([&>*:last-child]:mb-0) - on ask cards the thinking row's my-3 stacked
with the card's p-4 into a 28px void below (12px above); the card's own
padding is the bottom rhythm when a row ends the card.
2026-10-08 18:17:11 +03:00
amosblomqvist d5c4c3bf9f ui: the chat comeback — side-based authorship, restored quotes, tucked whys
Blockquotes: the callout override had displaced Streamdown's own styled
blockquote component, so plain quotes rendered as bare unstyled text
since that commit. The pass-through branch now restores Streamdown's
verbatim classes (border-l-4, muted italic).

Explanations tucked for ALL questions (owner): the prediction's Why /
Hide-why toggle is universal — every quiz answered card sits its
explanation behind the same collapsed button. Same pattern, one law.

The thinking row's rhythm: my-1 -> my-3. The 4px margin hugged the
options on non-graded answered cards (owner report); 12px matches the
card's mt-2/mt-3 spacing grammar everywhere the row renders.

Side-based authorship (owner round, 2026-10-07): the document shape
blurred user into agent — three left-rail idioms (user text, user
thinking, quoted prose) collided once quotes rendered. User rows go
RIGHT: 'You' messages and practice thinking cards hug the right edge at
85% width with the rail mirrored (border-r), text still reading
left-to-right. In-card thinking (inside the answered card, the agent's
context) stays left. Transcript thinking rows arrive EXPANDED — the
thinking was clearly sent. Cmd+T (toggle-user-thinking, chat scope,
cheat-sheet row) sets every user-thinking row to one state via a module
store: explicit sets stomp individual toggles, late mounts honor the
last set (the state initializer reads the store, so static render
reflects it too).
2026-10-08 02:29:05 +03:00
amosblomqvist 4eeb05b3c4 practice: the metadata popover — the node-card info-box register, not a drawer (round 17 refinement)
Owner corrections (2026-10-06): no expand/collapse; a quiet METADATA
trigger sits at the card's bottom (no divider — it just sits there);
click opens the info box in the graph-view node card's exact register
(rounded-xl border bg-card p-4 shadow-lg, w-80, floating ABOVE the
trigger so the transcript scroller never clips it); ANY scroll
(capture-phase — every scroller in the tree) or click outside closes
it, plus Esc claimed from the layered chain (usePopoverDismiss, the
popover law). Values match the model solution's font size
(text-[15px], verified — the drawer's text-xs did not); labels keep
the eyebrow register.
2026-10-06 04:26:34 +03:00
amosblomqvist 793638d6ce practice: the agent's data drawer — full transparency on every conclude card (round 17)
Owner ask (2026-10-06): reveal everything the agent filled in when
writing the problem and concluding it, at the very bottom of the
conclude card, collapsible, arriving collapsed.

The fields, both calls:
- problem: mode (recall/discrimination/composition), target
  proposition ids, statement, modelSolution (the last two ARE the
  visible card — the drawer shows the metadata only)
- conclude: outcome, hint rung (R0–R5/null), miss class
  (cue/discrimination/execution/careless/structural/null), retest.

Seams: problemInputForConclude (native-messages) walks the reveal's
walk and folds the WHOLE problem-call input onto the conclude part
(projectView join; same refused-pose law — an unacked pose folds
nothing); ArtifactPartProps grows problemInput. Targets resolve to
proposition NAMES at render (one lazy module-cached /api/graph fetch;
failure degrades to raw ids — observability never breaks the card).
The drawer: divider + chevron 'AGENT'S DATA' toggle (mono-caps
eyebrow register), definition rows with mono values, 'untagged'/
'none' honest empties, absent entirely when the calls filled nothing
(the dismissal line, legacy bare records).
2026-10-06 04:18:26 +03:00
amosblomqvist 05f083748b ui: conclude card — quiz-chip outcomes, verdict-first; YOUR THINKING / AGENT THINKING
Owner round 3 (2026-10-05):

- CONCLUDE CARD: the stacked same-weight headings are gone. Plain
  'Concluded' eyebrow + the outcome in the quiz cards' EXACT chip
  register. Colors per outcome: solved green (the 'correct' twin),
  solvedWithHints amber (succeeded with cost), surrendered red (the
  problem won), movedOn muted (the agent's call, not a verdict against
  the learner). Verdict as plain 50% prose under the heading — the
  'Verdict:' label is gone — then a divider, then the labeled model
  solution.
- ALL-CAPS: 'YOUR THINKING' and 'AGENT THINKING' — display strings only
  (the model-facing marker label stays sentence-case). The two rows are
  equal-length over the shared rail, so the chevrons align vertically.
  Dock field labels match.
2026-10-05 04:14:21 +03:00
amosblomqvist 0bd3236af0 practice: ONE send lane — the register is read from the text
Owner round 2 (2026-10-05), Slice H: the Nudge/Commit two-lane buttons
are gone. One Send; Enter sends, Shift+Enter is a newline. Whether a
submission claims an answer is apparent from the thinking itself — the
agent reads it (hint ladder for traces, moves+verdict for claims).

- The thinking input loses the commit field end-to-end: ChatInput,
  parseChatInput, newThinkingMessage (details and the model-facing label
  both collapse to the single 'Your thinking'), the optimistic marker.
- Legacy records' commit flags are deliberately unread.
- Doctrine: the two labeled channels become one read instruction; 'answer
  commits' section retitled 'Claimed answers' — a claim is not a
  progress signal.
- ThinkingCard: one label, collapsed arrival (the unified row).
- The dock placeholder no longer explains lanes that no longer exist.
2026-10-05 03:46:32 +03:00
amosblomqvist f460a90be9 ui: labeled conclusion sections — 'Model solution' hero, 'Verdict' below
Owner round 2 (2026-10-05), Slice G: 'Solved' alone over unlabeled prose
didn't read as the model solution. The hero now carries its own 'Model
solution' section label (the quiz cards' register), and the verdict
section mirrors it — label muted, text at the same 50% register as quiz
explanations.
2026-10-05 03:42:12 +03:00
amosblomqvist a5a554582e ui: intent-gated fold, measured height caps, the Problem eyebrow, fold fade
Owner round (2026-10-05), Slice D — the dock mechanics:

- INTENT-GATED FOLD: a ResizeObserver on the scroller's content stamps
  the existing 400ms mute whenever the transcript GROWS — growth frames
  (a live turn streaming under stick-to-bottom's chase) can never fold
  the dock; and a fold now needs the distance AND stick-to-bottom's
  isAtBottom agreeing the learner left. Fixes the generation churn
  (dock disappearing and reappearing while the agent works). Shrinks
  stamp nothing (the fold's own morph must not self-mute re-expand).
- MEASURED HEIGHT CAPS: the question (55dvh) and problem (40vh) areas
  now cap at the available column (scroller clientHeight − 2rem,
  re-measured on resize) via --dock-max-h — questions stretch to the
  top bar with sensible padding and scroll internally only when
  genuinely huge.
- The practice dock's statement area carries the 'Problem' eyebrow —
  the quiz cards' label row, mirrored (dock and transcript card read
  identically).
- The fold's CONTENT fade: a 160ms WAAPI fade/rise on the bar↔form
  toggle — no remount, so the question form's state survives; the
  shell height morph was already animated.
2026-10-05 02:31:55 +03:00
amosblomqvist 5d253a933c ui: ProblemCard/ConcludeCard redesigned — the solution is the hero
Owner round (2026-10-05), Slice C:

- ProblemCard: ALWAYS OPEN — the answered card's container + eyebrow
  discipline ('Problem' label, lh-prose statement), no chevron, no
  collapsed bar. The dock mirrors it in Slice D.
- ConcludeCard: the reveal is the modelSolution committed at POSE time,
  shown verbatim as the hero — never re-authored (the slim schema's
  law). The verdict rides below in the quiz-explanation register
  (small, muted 'Verdict:' row). Nothing collapsible. Legacy inputs
  with their own solutionReveal fall back to it.
- The reveal join: modelSolutionForConclude (native-messages.ts) — the
  newest cleanly-posed problem before the conclude call; refused poses
  reveal nothing. projectView enriches tool-conclude parts with
  part.reveal at projection; ArtifactPartProps carries the field
  (contracts/chat.ts).

Pinned: always-open problem card; hero-first conclude layout with the
verdict after it; legacy fallback; the join (clean pose, refused pose,
multi-problem records) and the view enrichment.
2026-10-05 02:29:16 +03:00
amosblomqvist 90893ae236 graph context: a separate marker message before the first user turn
The map picks no longer glue into the opening prompt as seed text
(owner, 2026-10-04 late). POST /api/chats accepts graphContext
{propositions}; the route resolves the picks against the live graph,
derives the reasoning chains among them (chainsForSelection →
formatChainLine), and writes a graph-context custom marker as
message[0] — before the learner's first user message, in either mode.

- Core: newGraphContextMessage (model-facing content = the
  contextualization framing + proposition lines + chain lines;
  details = the structured pick); toLlmMessages flattens it to a user
  message like every marker, so the model reads it for free.
- View: projects to a user-side data-graph-context part.
- UI: GraphContextCard — minimal, muted, dashed, collapsed by default
  (counts only); expand reveals name — statement rows and the chain
  lines. Same compact-expandable pattern as the practice cards.
- Home: sends graphContext with the creation whenever picks exist;
  the prompt param carries the learner's own words only.
2026-10-04 23:07:13 +03:00
amosblomqvist 59bf5bf219 practice UI: the dock, the transcript cards, layered-Esc discard
- PracticeDock (components/practice-dock.tsx): the active problem
  replaces the composer — statement (markdown+LaTeX) above, the 'Your
  thinking' composer-twin below with the two submit lanes (Nudge =
  thinking without a commit; Commit = answer commit; ⌘/Ctrl+Enter
  commits). Dictation claims the thinking field.
- Transcript cards (practice-cards.tsx + the artifact registry): the
  problem card (compact-expandable statement — the commitment NEVER
  renders), the conclude card (outcome + verdict + reveal; the
  dismissal synthesis is one muted line), and the user-side thinking
  register cards (Your thinking / Your solution).
- view.ts: the problem pose joins the placeholder fork (the ack never
  flips the part); practice-thinking markers project as data parts;
  problem-dismissed markers project nothing.
- chat.tsx: activeProblemOf drives the dock branch (question > problem
  > composer), the esc layering gains the problem rung (below question,
  above turn) with its discard confirm + the silent marker route; the
  thinking submissions POST through the session's optimistic appends.
2026-10-04 21:55:54 +03:00