"use client";
import { useState } from "react";
import { ConfidenceRail } from "@/components/confidence-rail";
import { GlyphMark } from "@/components/ui/glyph-mark";
import { ThinkingBlock } from "@/components/thinking-block";
import { cn } from "@/lib/utils";
import { MessageResponse } from "@/components/ai-elements/message";
import type { QuestionAnswerData } from "@/src/core";
/**
* Static rendering of an answered question (tool part in `output-available`).
*
* Quiz answers are GRADED: ✓/✗ marks, the correct answers, and the
* explanation. Ask answers are NOT graded — a plain record of what was said.
* (The v1 bug this pins: ask answers must never get quiz grading UI.)
* Explain answers are graded by the MODEL in its next reply, not by the
* client — the card reveals his answer, the committed correct answer, and
* the explanation, with NO verdict chips (owner ruling 2026-09-27).
*/
export function AnsweredCard({ answer }: { answer: QuestionAnswerData }) {
const [whyOpen, setWhyOpen] = useState(false); // the tucked explanation (predictions, owner 2026-10-03)
if (answer.dismissed) {
return (
{answer.questionText} — skipped
);
}
const isQuiz = answer.kind === "quiz";
const isExplain = answer.kind === "explain";
const selectedIdx = new Set(answer.answers.map((a) => a.index));
const correctIdx = new Set(answer.correctIndices ?? []);
return (
<>
{/* The reading channel LIFTED (owner round, 2026-10-05): thoughts
captured while reading are chronologically PRIOR to the question —
rendered as its own user-side block ABOVE the card, the unified
ThinkingBlock, instead of an inset inside the answer. Same muted
rail as before; the label is now plain "Your thinking". */}
{answer.readingThinking && (
)}
{isQuiz && (
// Zapf-Dingbats-derived SVG outlines — the exact LaTeX \ding{51}/
// \ding{55} hand-drawn shapes (owner, round 6); see ui/glyph-mark.
{/* Owner round 8: a touch smaller than the text (size-4→size-3.5,
≈14px vs the 16px row) while centered. */}
{(key || sel) && }
)}
{opt.label}
);
})}
{/* The learner's own typed option is an OPTION — same container,
same selected styling as its siblings, not a loose quote
floating outside the list. Quotes keep the learner's words. */}
{answer.other && (
“{answer.other}”
)}
)}
{answer.text &&
“{answer.text}”
}
{/* The confidence record (owner round 6): the slider's rail, disc
removed — the missing handle itself says "this is a record, not a
control". Same paint, same ticks, same ramp, same % read-out as the
live dock. Quiz answers only, and only when a confidence exists:
"I don't know" sent none (its slider was grayed out), explain and
ask never had one, and records from before the feature carry no
field — nothing to show, nothing rendered. */}
{isQuiz && answer.confidence != null && (
{answer.confidence}%
)}
{answer.dontKnow && isQuiz && (
Answered “I don't know”.
)}
{(answer.thinking ?? answer.note) && (
/* The SAME unified row (owner round, 2026-10-05): the quiz answer's
thinking is the identical collapsible ThinkingBlock — it just
happens to sit inside the quiz container. Same placement, same
trigger, same 50%-italic quote block on expand. */
)}
{/* px-3→removed: card p-4 + box px-3 double-inset sat the "Why" label deeper
than the option box edges (owner, round 3). Sides flush with everything
else; py-2 stays for vertical air. */}
{isQuiz && answer.explanation && answer.questionType === "predict" ? (
/* The TUCKED explanation (owner 2026-10-03): a prediction's
verdict shows, but the explanation sits collapsed — viewable,
never center stage. The teaching that follows resolves the
prediction; THAT is the real explanation. */
{whyOpen && (
Why: {answer.explanation}
)}
) : (
isQuiz &&
answer.explanation && (
Why:
{/* The markdown wrapper must go truly inline — a block
after the
"Why:" label created the oversized leading gap (owner's fix list). */}
{answer.explanation}
)
)}
{/* The explain reveal (owner ruling 2026-09-27): the committed answer
— one field, reasoning included — shown on submit; no verdict,
the model's next reply IS the grading. */}
{isExplain && answer.committed && (