38 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Palette readability candidate
|
|
|
|
Source **afa74a305980f611437dd3aa2f937d36e9266cfe** combines the reviewed palette,
|
|
canvas boundaries, process topology outlines and read-only input correction with
|
|
the lifecycle/typed-activation integration. The Windows `style::tests` gate passes
|
|
all **10 tests**, with no failures or ignored cases and 862 filtered out. It
|
|
compiled in 7m20s and ran in 3.85s, closing 2026-09-13 at 00:37:15 UTC with exit 0.
|
|
All **538 committed inputs** remained unchanged; input-manifest SHA-256 is
|
|
`d7dc0bd3b642e50c2796035696fc6da5bb0cbf07e680e15528c49229544c5583`.
|
|
[Exact command and result](experiments/diagram-removal-windows-20260912/palette-afa74a3.result.json)
|
|
and [raw output](experiments/diagram-removal-windows-20260912/palette-afa74a3.log)
|
|
retain the test identities. This targeted result does not establish full-suite,
|
|
native interaction or physical-monitor acceptance.
|
|
|
|
The [decision and acceptance boundary](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/palette-integration-decision-20260913.md)
|
|
records why the first candidate strengthens essential luminance contrast while
|
|
retaining category cues and lighter decorative dividers. The Source editor uses
|
|
a separate static dark syntax/selection palette. The read-only input adapter
|
|
retains selection and copy while the missing input callback still prevents edits.
|
|
|
|
- [Source audit and candidate comparison](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/palette-readability-audit-20260912.md)
|
|
- [Independent critique and arithmetic](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/palette-readability-independent-critique-20260912.md)
|
|
- [Source-selection alternatives and API evidence](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/palette-selection-remedy-20260912.md)
|
|
- [Foundation correction and actual-widget evaluator](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/palette-readonly-correction-source-handoff-20260913.md)
|
|
- [Independent correction review and residual consumers](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/palette-correction-independent-review-20260913.md)
|
|
- [Routing-warning selector scope and alternatives](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/routing-warning-selector-scope-20260913.md)
|
|
- [Exact archived payload identities](experiments/palette-readability-20260913/manifest.json)
|
|
|
|
The archive preserves historical source-only findings verbatim. In particular,
|
|
the original foundation's false claim that disabled inputs cannot select is
|
|
superseded by its correction and independent review. Numeric contrast tests are
|
|
engineering benchmarks, not proof that all physical monitors display the result
|
|
well. Native syntax scanability, thin strokes at Fit, keyboard focus and actual
|
|
selection remain separate acceptance observations. Custom chooser/menu keyboard
|
|
target cues and faint control boundaries identified in the residual review need
|
|
their bounded correction and combined verification. Routing-warning selection
|
|
remains a separate unfinished interaction change. Issue #26 remains open.
|