16 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
16 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Historical Process return/navigation reviews
|
|
|
|
The two Markdown reports are byte-for-byte copies of the independent delegated
|
|
reviews `.local/process-return-review.md` and `.local/process-return-review-2.md`,
|
|
written on 2026-09-23 against successive working diffs over b153451. They record
|
|
static source inspection, findings, correction assessment and remaining test
|
|
gaps at those checkpoints. They did not execute Cargo or native UI and are not
|
|
acceptance receipts for the final source.
|
|
|
|
Review 1 identified the invalid nonprimary menu test setup and retained qualified
|
|
identity during explicit local navigation. Review 2 assessed the broader fix
|
|
and distinguished protective test gaps from demonstrated defects. Preserve
|
|
their historical wording; subsequent gate/source/native evidence establishes
|
|
what was tested later. files.json pins both exact copied reports and this
|
|
provenance note. The [native run-3 review](process-native-review-3.md) is a portable copy with only archive-link formatting adapted; the original review hash is recorded in it. [Parent observations](run-3-observations.md) describe the actual input sequence. The four browseable screenshots under `images/` are exact copies of their native archive members. The review identifies a remaining routing readability defect, not a model-corruption result.
|